gotwind.org FORUM
gotwind.org FORUM
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Private Messages | Search | FAQ

 All Forums
 gotwing.org - general comments
 Click here to post comments/questions
 Wireless remote control for inverters

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Enter Anti SPAM Code: Please enter this code in the box below. If you cannot read it refresh the page. Click here for more detailed instructions.Play Sound
Click here to refresh this page
Message Icon:              
             
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
speo Posted - 11/04/2008 : 06:10:39
Hello guys,

I tought it would be cool to turn my inverter on and off using a wireless remote control, instead of walking to the shed in the middle of the night, so, here is a little project that I put together with Ghurd's help.

The wireless remote control consists of a transmitter and a receiver I bought from eBay for $8, from the seller e-madeinchn . He sells lots of different remote controls.



The receiver is actualy a 3A relay that gets wirelesly activated by the transmitter. By replacing the inverter's switch with this relay, or by soldering it in paralel, the inverter can be turned on/off using the transmitter (the remote control).

I choosed this solution because the remote control is using only 8mA in standby and 25mA when the relay is energized. This is a very low consumption, compared to 250mA drained by the inverter alone, turned on, but without any load. Also, the amperage through the inverter's switch was only 6mA, which can be easily handled by a 3A relay.


In the image above, the box, the PCB and the blue connectors were $6 at an electronic parts store





In the image above, the five connectors, from right to left are:
1 - positive battery
2 - negative battery
3 - relay common
4 - relay NO
5 - relay NC



In the image above, I soldered two wires paralel to the switch and took them out through a whole I made in the face plate.



Here is all of it assembled.
The wires from the inverter's switch are hooked to the receiver's relay (Common leg and NO leg, for normaly open position).
The inverter's switch is off, so, the relay can turn on/off the inverter.
The receiver and the inverter are both hooked to the 12V battery

Here is a 160KB movie with the wireless remote in action: http://www.otherpower.com/images/scimages/1917/onoff.MPG

I tested it to see how far it works:<br>
- 120 feet (40m) works 100%<br>
- 180 feet (60m) works 75% (works 3 times out of 4 tries)<br>
- 250 feet (80m) works 50% (works 1 time out of 2 tries)<br>

The funny thing is that even at 200 feet, when it doesnt work, the bulb still flickers when I push the remote's button. It seems like the receiver gets the signal, turns the inverter on, then shuts it off immediately. If I get closer, it works fine again, then if I get back at 200 feet, it flickers again...

Anyway, I am quite happy with the results.

Thanks for taking the time to read this,
Speo

www.windpulse.com
5   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
speo Posted - 13/04/2008 : 08:08:11
Gholt, you are more than welcome.

Poor Ghurd ? Yes, you are right, I really off bugged him a lot lately, but with another project :)

Speo

www.windpulse.com
BushWhacker Posted - 12/04/2008 : 14:23:44
Gholt;
That last emotioncon was in jest. I just thought the best exit was a little levity.

No hard feelings here,
BW

Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler. - Albert Einstein
gholt Posted - 12/04/2008 : 05:56:31
BW,

My apologies, I got way too excited and just needed to read read read a bit.

To All,

BW was being generous in answering my questions which were removed from the above post because ... well what BW said :)

G.
BushWhacker Posted - 12/04/2008 : 04:54:17
Edited Because Gholt edited and it makes my response look like I'm on drugs.

Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler. - Albert Einstein
gholt Posted - 12/04/2008 : 04:26:19
Hey Speo ... that's just slicker than something I stepped in last week!! I want one. Very nice photos of your project too.

Poor ghurd ... :)

Ok, I've looked up the seller on ebay and he sells a myriad of remote control devices - how cool!

Thanks for the cool idea and inspiration.

G.

gotwind.org FORUM © 2000-05 ForumCo.com Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000
RSS Feed 1 RSS Feed 2
Powered by ForumCo 2000-2008
TOS - AUP - URA
ForumCo Free Blogs and Galleries
Signup for a free forum or Go Banner Free